Authors |
Liu J, Sempos CT, Donahue RP, Dorn J, Trevisan M, Grundy SM. |
|
Title |
Non-high-density lipoprotein and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and their risk predictive values in coronary heart disease |
|
Full source | Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1363-8 | |
|
||
|
||
Abstract |
To
determine if non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol is a more
useful predictor of coronary heart disease (CHD) risk than low-density
lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and if very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)
cholesterol is an independent predictor of CHD risk, data from the Framingham
Heart Study (2,693 men, 3,101 women) were used for this analysis. All
subjects were aged > or =30 years and free of CHD at baseline, and
incident CHD was the end point (618 men, 372 women). Cox proportional-hazards
models were used to assess the risk for CHD (relative risks and 95% confidence
intervals) on the basis of the joint distribution of LDL cholesterol and
non-HDL cholesterol (in milligrams per deciliter), as well as LDL cholesterol,
non-HDL cholesterol, and VLDL cholesterol as continuous variables. After
multivariate adjustment, within non-HDL cholesterol level, no association
was found between LDL cholesterol and the risk for CHD, whereas within
LDL cholesterol levels, a strong positive and graded association between
non-HDL cholesterol and risk for CHD was observed. When the analysis was
repeated within triglyceride levels (<200 vs > or =200 mg/dl), the
risk pattern did not change significantly. Also, VLDL cholesterol was
found to be a significant predictor of CHD risk after adjusting for LDL
cholesterol at triglyceride levels of > or =200 or <200 mg/dl. In
conclusion, these results suggest that non-HDL cholesterol level is a
stronger predictor of CHD risk than LDL cholesterol; that is, VLDL cholesterol
may play a critical role in the development of CHD. |