IMPLICAZIONI PRATICHE DELLO STUDIO JUPITER
   
Author Jean-Pierre Després
Title Bringing JUPITER down to earth
Full source Lancet 2009;373:1147-48
Text

In The Lancet today, Paul Ridker and colleagues1 present a much awaited subanalysis from the JUPITER trial. In the initial report,2 these investigators tested and validated the hypothesis that asymptomatic individuals with normal LDL cholesterol concentrations but with evidence of inflammation (increased C-reactive protein) would benefit from treatment with a statin. Results of the new a-priori analyses show that asymptomatic individuals randomly allocated to rosuvastatin for just less than 2 years benefited particularly from this drug if low concentrations of both LDL cholesterol and C-reactive protein were achieved. These findings add to evidence that cardiovascular disease has an inflammatory component3 and suggest that inflammation could become another target for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Although, in many guidelines, LDL cholesterol is recommended as the most important target for lipid-lowering treatment, Ridker and his team have shown previously that other variables of the lipid profile—such as the cholesterol to HDL cholesterol ratio—are, when combined with C-reactive protein, better predictors of coronary heart disease risk than is LDL cholesterol alone.4 Therefore, although this prespecified analysis on the basis of achieved LDL cholesterol is relevant, we should pay attention to the additional results of the report, which indicate that irrespective of the lipid endpoint used (including the apolipoprotein B to apolipoprotein AI ratio), a low concentration of C-reactive protein achieved with rosuvastatin treatment confers the best prognosis.
What do we do with these findings? Although JUPITER provides support to the lipid-inflammation target as proof of concept, Ridker and colleagues now need to put their work into a clinical and public health perspective. For instance, many groups around the world have shown that a sedentary lifestyle, poor level of fitness, abdominal obesity, smoking, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome are all predictive of raised concentrations of C-reactive protein.5—9 Although statins have enhanced greatly the ability to lower LDL cholesterol and thereby risk for cardiovascular disease,10 hopefully the findings of JUPITER will spark further discussion on appropriate use of these drugs.

The JUPITER results also indicate that we need to do a better job at global cardiovascular disease risk-assessment.11 Furthermore, despite the fact that regular exercise is a remarkable and cheap “polypill”, a comparison of the absolute reduction in risk for coronary heart disease that is gained after statin treatment versus that with a lifestyle-modification programme aimed at weight loss and improved fitness is unlikely to happen in the near future. A low level of cardiorespiratory fitness is a powerful predictor of cardiovascular disease independent of most studied risk factors.12

This issue is important with respect to prophylactic use of a powerful statin such as rosuvastatin in primary prevention. The figure shows a behaviour that has unfortunately become the norm rather than the exception. It is not meant to make trivial the contribution of statins to cardiovascular disease prevention. However, before we recommend lifetime treatment with rosuvastatin for millions of presumably asymptomatic individuals, we should remember that we do not have long-term safety data for this drug.
Despite overwhelming evidence for the clinical benefits of statins in terms of relative-risk reduction, absolute reduction in risk is the clinically relevant outcome. For example, even if raised concentrations of C-reactive protein in an individual increase the relative risk threefold, the patient could be at low absolute risk in the absence of other risk factors.

From a pathophysiological standpoint, JUPITER provides key experimental data that inflammation is an important mediator of the clinical benefits of rosuvastatin. However, to immediately translate these findings into clinical practice without appropriate and careful discussion of their implications is not prudent. Hopefully, focus on the JUPITER trial will spur constructive and responsible dialogues to prioritise clinical and public health actions for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. How can we delineate the proper population to treat? When should we use C-reactive protein in clinical practice? These issues will have to be examined carefully.

References

1 Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, et alon behalf of the JUPITER Trial Study Group. Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the JUPITER trial. Lancet 200910.1016/S0140-6736(09)60447-5. published online March 29, 2009. PubMed
2 Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FAH, et alfor the JUPITER Study Group. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2195-2207.
3 Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation 2002; 105: 1135-1143.
4 Ridker PM, Rifai N, Cook NR, Bradwin G, Buring JE. Non-HDL cholesterol, apolipoproteins A-I and B100, standard lipid measures, lipid ratios, and CRP as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in women. JAMA 2005; 294: 326-333.
5 Hak AE, Stehouwer CD, Bots ML, et al. Associations of C-reactive protein with measures of obesity, insulin resistance, and subclinical atherosclerosis in healthy, middle-aged women. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999; 19: 1986-1991.
6 Lemieux I, Pascot A, Prud'homme D, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein: another component of the atherothrombotic profile of abdominal obesity. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2001; 21: 961-967.
7 Church TS, Barlow CE, Earnest CP, Kampert JB, Priest EL, Blair SN. Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and C-reactive protein in men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002; 22: 1869-1876.
8 Ridker PM, Buring JE, Cook NR, Rifai N. C-reactive protein, the metabolic syndrome, and risk of incident cardiovascular events: an 8-year follow-up of 14719 initially healthy American women. Circulation 2003; 107: 391-397.
9 Tracy RP, Psaty BM, Macy E, et al. Lifetime smoking exposure affects the association of C-reactive protein with cardiovascular disease risk factors and subclinical disease in healthy elderly subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997; 17: 2167-2176.
10 Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90 056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005; 366: 1267-1278.
11 Després J-P, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature 2006; 444: 881-887.
12 Sui X, LaMonte MJ, Blair SN. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a predictor of nonfatal cardiovascular events in asymptomatic women and men. Am J Epidemiol 2007; 165: 1413-1423.